On Saturday, the Badminton World Federation’s annual normal assembly will talk about and vote on a proposal to alter the scoring system within the sport, which may come into pressure after Tokyo 2020.

A proposal has been made by Badminton Indonesia and the Maldives Badminton Affiliation to amend the legal guidelines of badminton referring to the scoring system. It has been accredited by Badminton Asia, Badminton Korea Affiliation and Chinese language Taipei Badminton Affiliation. The BWF Council has expressed its assist for the proposal.

The proposal requires the implementation of a brand new scoring system (5×11) based mostly on a variety of elements, primarily as a result of matches are seen as a possibility to be extra tv pleasant when it comes to period.

Updates: On Saturday the BWF introduced that the movement didn’t obtain the required votes.

Fundamentals of Proposal

Present scoring system: three video games of not less than 21 factors required to win every recreation

New scoring system: 5 video games of not less than 11 factors are wanted to win every recreation

Adjustments in scoring system:

  • A recreation will likely be received by the facet that scores 11 factors as an alternative of the primary 21.
  • If the rating turns into 10-all (as an alternative of 20-all), the facet that has a two-point lead first wins the sport.
  • If the rating is 14-all (as an alternative of 29-all), the group scoring the fifteenth level (as an alternative of the thirtieth level) wins that recreation.
  • Gamers will change on the finish of every accomplished recreation for so long as the match continues, and within the fifth recreation when one facet receives the primary six factors.
Highlights of the New Factors System (through BWF)

Main Goals as per BWF

  • Suspense builds sooner – extra depth in matches
  • elevated enthusiasm in matches
  • Barely shortening the size of matches – to optimize tv broadcasts and defend the well-being of gamers.

Will Tokyo 2020 be affected?

The date of implementation will likely be mentioned and determined by the BWF Council, however the system is not going to be applied earlier than the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Video games, and can possible not be totally applied earlier than January 2022 to permit gamers and coaches to apply and make modifications. earlier than permitting your self to organize correctly. applied. The BWF mentioned in its assertion that the implementation date will now give gamers and coaches ample alternative to get accustomed to the system earlier than the beginning of the Olympic qualification interval for Paris 2024.

5×11 system background

The proposal for a brand new scoring system was first articulated by the BWF Council in March 2014 because it was felt that matches had been getting longer whereas the shuttle was in play for a a lot shorter period than earlier than.

In November 2017, at a council session in Montego Bay, Jamaica, a proposal to implement the 5×11 system was mentioned, with suggestions from broadcasters.

The decision was put to vote on the BWF AGM in Bangkok in Could 2018, and acquired 129 votes in favor and 123 votes in opposition to, however was not handed because it required a two-thirds majority of 168 .

The BWF believes the distinction this time is that the preparation time till the beginning of the following Olympic qualification interval is for much longer – beginning solely in Could 2023.

historical past

In 2014, a dialogue about three completely different prospects occurred within the first formal debate on the topic since 2006, when the BWF launched a rally level scoring system (21 × 3) that continues to be in place at this time.

For the reason that flip of the century, the scoring system has seen some modifications. The normal 15-point (males’s) / 11-point (girls’s) format through which a participant may solely rating factors on his serve was dropped earlier.

In keeping with Mumbai Mirrorthe world physique experimented with the 7-point traditional format in 5 matches in 2002, however returned to the standard scoring system inside a number of months “as each gamers and spectators had been sad with the scoring system. The present 21×3 rally-point system in 2006 and although many gamers had been initially criticizing the format, they’ve slowly however absolutely heated up within the format.

The traditional 15×3 system with solely factors on serve offers approach to the 21×3 system with factors for each rally, and was seen as a transfer to keep away from gamers prioritizing solely their very own actions.

“The change to the scoring system in 2006 was a way more basic change in our sport, shifting in direction of a rally-point system,” the BWF mentioned in its assertion.

“On the time many comparable questions and fears had been raised: badminton would lose its character, pure talent could be misplaced, and the game would turn into far more aggressive and fewer tactical. Nothing occurred. underestimated as a result of they had been in a position to adapt to a really basic change and advance the game as a spectacle, and badminton remained a highly-skilled exercise with nice range and completely different types of play.”

Statistical evaluation

In keeping with the modeling evaluation achieved by BWF with respect to the brand new system, listed below are the printed findings:

  • The probabilities of successful matches within the check system are virtually the identical as within the present system.
  • Because the variety of video games within the trial scoring system will increase and reduces, the weaker participant has likelihood of successful not less than one recreation.
  • The present system has longer video games, however the potential for enlargement into three video games is slim, particularly in uneven matches. The check system consists of smaller video games, however is extra more likely to increase to greater than three video games.

The complete report is obtainable right here.


“The proposed scoring system modifications are a part of my imaginative and prescient to make badminton extra thrilling and enhance leisure worth for stakeholders and followers,” mentioned Paul-Erik Hoyer, BWF president and 1996 Olympic champion for Denmark. this proposal.

“It’s proposed to be launched solely after the Tokyo 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Video games. So, I imagine this can be a extra favorable time to impact this variation.”

Nearer to residence, nationwide coach and Indian legend Pullela Gopichand felt this was a change that was not essential.

“As an alternative of fixing the scoring system, many issues will be achieved,” Gopichand is quoted as saying. first put up,

“But when the BWF is pressured to make modifications in favor of shorter video games, I would favor to go for the 15*3 system over the present points-per-rally format as an alternative of the 11*5. Having mentioned that, I I am not conscious of the scientific data the BWF has, however I hope they’ve legitimate causes for what they’re doing. They’re tinkering with the numeral format, one thing that does not exist in any respect Not very best. There are extra issues that may be achieved for the great of the sport than simply touching the scoring system in the meanwhile.”

In April, former world No. 1 and Danish famous person Viktor Axelsen lamented that gamers have little say on issues corresponding to the brand new scoring system.

“Previous to the 2018 proposal, the gamers had been consulted via numerous questionnaires and suggestions acquired via the BWF Athletes Fee. The BWF additionally took notice of the gamers’ suggestions and feedback within the media. It’s honest to say that the majority gamers had been skeptical in regards to the change and had objections as as to whether the change was match for badminton.

“We imagine that the gamers’ opinions are more likely to nonetheless be comparable, however because the proposal has been placed on the AGM agenda by the 2 member associations (and never the BWF Council), there has not been intensive session by the BWF Council earlier than the proposal. Nevertheless, the BWF has shared details about the proposal with our prime participant teams and encourages member associations and gamers to have a better dialog in regards to the proposed modifications to the scoring system.

You possibly can learn the total record of steadily requested questions printed by BWF for the brand new scoring system right here.

Supply hyperlink