Dushyant Singh Pundi

Tribune Information Service

Chandigarh, November 25

Regardless of main in clear water and sanitation and 4 different parameters, Chandigarh didn’t maintain tempo with Shimla and Coimbatore within the first Sustainable Growth Objectives (SDG) city India index.

With an total rating of 72.36, the UT stood third in NITI Aayog’s first SDG City India Index and Dashboard (2021-22).

Shimla topped the index with an total rating of 75.50 factors and Coimbatore stood second with 73.29 factors.

As per reviews, Chandigarh outperformed Shimla and Coimbatore within the clear water and sanitation section with 87, 72 and 67 marks respectively. The union territory scored lower than Shimla and Coimbatore on 4 different parameters together with gender equality, clear water and sanitation Inequalities and sustainable cities and communities. Within the subject of high quality schooling, the union territory with 88 marks was simply two factors behind Coimbatore, however forward of Shimla, which acquired 69 marks. Nonetheless, the town lagged behind on 9 out of 14 parameters, together with no poverty, zero starvation, good well being and wellbeing, reasonably priced and clear power, good work and financial progress, trade, innovation and infrastructure, sustainable consumption and manufacturing, local weather motion. Are included. and peace, justice and stronger establishments.

UT recorded one of the best efficiency within the space of ​​sustainable cities and communities. With 90 factors, the town was far forward of Shimla and Coimbatore (with 64 and 73 factors respectively). Nonetheless, the UT lags behind Shimla and Coimbatore in sustainable consumption and manufacturing. Queen of Hills acquired 100 factors and Coimbatore acquired 91 factors, whereas UT acquired 74 factors. Shimla maintained its stride and secured 100 marks within the local weather motion part, however however, Coimbatore and Chandigarh each scored the identical 67 marks.

As per reviews, the SDG City Index and Dashboard ranks 56 city areas based mostly on 77 SDG indicators out of the 46 targets of the SDG framework. Of the 56, 44 are city areas with a inhabitants of multiple million and 12 are state capitals with a inhabitants of lower than a million. City areas are ranked on a scale of 0-100 for every SDG and a rating of 100 signifies that the city space has achieved the targets set for 2030.

Supply hyperlink